People v. Parrilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Parrilla

105 A.D.2d 811, 481 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20931

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 105 A.D.2d 811 (People v. Parrilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Parrilla, 105 A.D.2d 811, 481 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Lury, J.), rendered May 11,1982, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the trial court’s charge to the jury impermissibly shifted to the defense the burden of proving that his possession of the weapon was temporary and lawful has not been preserved for review as a matter of law (see CPL 470.05, subd 2; People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273; People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467) and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (De Lury, J.), rendered May 11,1982, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that the trial court’s charge to the jury impermissibly shifted to the defense the burden of proving that his possession of the weapon was temporary and lawful has not been preserved for review as a matter of law (see CPL 470.05, subd 2; People v Whalen, 59 NY2d 273; People v Thomas, 50 NY2d 467) and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.2d 811, 481 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-parrilla-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack