People v. Parrada

168 A.D.2d 576

This text of 168 A.D.2d 576 (People v. Parrada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Parrada, 168 A.D.2d 576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.), rendered December 6, 1988, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the trial court improperly failed to give limiting instructions when the prosecutor, on cross-examination, elicited the defendant’s previously suppressed statement, is unpreserved for appellate review. We decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D.2d 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-parrada-nyappdiv-1990.