People v. Parow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Parow

109 A.D.3d 1050, 971 N.Y.S.2d 486

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 109 A.D.3d 1050 (People v. Parow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Parow, 109 A.D.3d 1050, 971 N.Y.S.2d 486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered October 31, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (two counts).

In satisfaction of an indictment charging him with two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant pleaded guilty to two reduced counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and waived his right to appeal orally and in writing. Thereafter, in accord with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to, among other things, two concurrent terms of five years of probation. This appeal ensued.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

[1051]*1051Peters, EJ., Rose, Lahtinen and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), rendered October 31, 2011, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (two counts).

In satisfaction of an indictment charging him with two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, defendant pleaded guilty to two reduced counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and waived his right to appeal orally and in writing. Thereafter, in accord with the plea agreement, he was sentenced to, among other things, two concurrent terms of five years of probation. This appeal ensued.

Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and counsel’s brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and counsel’s request for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, 980 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

[1051]*1051Peters, EJ., Rose, Lahtinen and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 A.D.3d 1050, 971 N.Y.S.2d 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-parow-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack