People v. Parkinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Parkinson

43 A.D.3d 1187, 841 N.Y.S.2d 800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 25, 2007

StatusPublished

This text of 43 A.D.3d 1187 (People v. Parkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Parkinson, 43 A.D.3d 1187, 841 N.Y.S.2d 800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.), rendered December 17, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under Superior Court information No. 2102/03, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

We note that the defendant’s motion to extend his time to take an appeal from a judgment rendered on S.C.I. No. 2498/04 was denied by decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 7, 2006, and counsel was never assigned to represent the defendant in connection with that matter. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Fisher, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Belfi, J.), rendered December 17, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under Superior Court information No. 2102/03, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

We note that the defendant’s motion to extend his time to take an appeal from a judgment rendered on S.C.I. No. 2498/04 was denied by decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 7, 2006, and counsel was never assigned to represent the defendant in connection with that matter. Crane, J.P., Ritter, Fisher, Covello and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 A.D.3d 1187, 841 N.Y.S.2d 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-parkinson-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack