People v. Parker
4 Johns. 424
Opinion
The store was not within the curtelage, as there was no fence or yard, enclosing, the dwelling-house and store, so as to bring them within one enclosure. This brings the case within that of the King v. Garland, (Leach, 130.) and distinguishes it from Gibson’s case, (Leach, 287.) The prisoner must be discharged.
Prisoner discharge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Parker, 4 Johns. 424 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1809).
4 Johns. 424 (People v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collins v. Central Trust Co.
135 Misc. 465 (New York Supreme Court, 1929)
In re City of New York
118 Misc. 161 (New York Supreme Court, 1922)
State v. Hecox
83 Mo. 531 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)