People v. Parker

222 A.D.2d 1103, 636 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14192
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Parker. Read the opinion of the Court — 191 A.D.2d 717

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Under the circumstances of this case, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment (see, People v Cruickshank, 105 AD2d 325, 333-336, affd sub nom. People v Dawn Maria C., 67 NY2d 625), and we decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to grant such treatment (see, People v Gaziano [appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 870; cf., People v Shrubsall, 167 AD2d 929, 930). Furthermore, we conclude that the imposition of an indeterminate term of incarceration of 2Vs to 7 years upon defendant’s conviction of burglary in the third degree is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J. — Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Parker, 222 A.D.2d 1103, 636 N.Y.S.2d 696, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 1103 (People v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dawn Maria C.
490 N.E.2d 530 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
People v. Cruickshank
105 A.D.2d 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Shrubsall
167 A.D.2d 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Gaziano
219 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)