People v. Paris
140 A.D.2d 721, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6138
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Paris. Read the opinion of the Court — 138 A.D.2d 534 →
Opinion
Based upon our review of the record, we conclude that the alleged trial improprieties did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, affd 65 NY2d 837; People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). We find no merit to the defendant’s contention that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Harwood, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Paris, 140 A.D.2d 721, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6138 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).
140 A.D.2d 721 (People v. Paris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Roopchand
107 A.D.2d 35 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)