People v. Parham

258 A.D.2d 636, 682 N.Y.S.2d 905
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Parham. Read the opinion of the Court — 238 A.D.2d 446

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered May 9, 1997, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Parham, 258 A.D.2d 636, 682 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

258 A.D.2d 636 (People v. Parham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)