People v. Parente

104 A.D.2d 667, 480 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20079
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 1984·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Groh, J.), rendered November 10,1982, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The People proved defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and excluded to a moral certainty every reasonable hypothesis other than guilt. The photograph of defendant provided to the police by the complainant was not properly the subject of a suppression motion because its production and the identification were not the result of a police-initiated identification procedure, but rather were the fruits of the independent activities of private citizens (People v Logan, 25 NY2d 184, 194; see, also, People v Laguer, 58 AD2d 610). In any event, there was more than an adequate independent basis upon which the eyewitness made the lineup identification. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, O’Connor and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Parente, 104 A.D.2d 667, 480 N.Y.S.2d 40, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20079 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

104 A.D.2d 667 (People v. Parente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thomas
138 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Whitaker
126 A.D.2d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Morales
113 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
People v. Fiorvante
108 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)