People v. Paredes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Paredes

210 A.D.2d 355, 620 N.Y.S.2d 273

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Paredes. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 A.D.2d 440 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 12, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), imposed January 4,1993.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74). We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hanophy, J.), imposed January 4,1993.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Burk, 181 AD2d 74). We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Ritter, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Paredes, 210 A.D.2d 355, 620 N.Y.S.2d 273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

210 A.D.2d 355 (People v. Paredes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related