People v. Paredes

179 A.D.2d 440, 578 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 165
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 14, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Defendant’s conviction arises out of his presence in an apartment during a police seizure of approximately one kilogram of cocaine from a table inside the apartment.

The People stipulated they would not seek to introduce into evidence any property recovered from defendant’s person, and as defendant’s moving papers contained no sworn factual allegations demonstrating a personal, legitimate expectation of privacy in the premises from which the drugs were recovered (People v Wesley, 73 NY2d 351, 358-359), the trial court properly summarily denied defendant’s application for a Mapp/Dunaway hearing (CPL 710.60 [3] [b]). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Paredes, 179 A.D.2d 440, 578 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

179 A.D.2d 440 (People v. Paredes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Howard
234 A.D.2d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)