People v. Paredes
This text of 179 A.D.2d 440 (People v. Paredes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s conviction arises out of his presence in an apartment during a police seizure of approximately one kilogram of cocaine from a table inside the apartment.
The People stipulated they would not seek to introduce into evidence any property recovered from defendant’s person, and as defendant’s moving papers contained no sworn factual allegations demonstrating a personal, legitimate expectation of privacy in the premises from which the drugs were recovered (People v Wesley, 73 NY2d 351, 358-359), the trial court properly summarily denied defendant’s application for a Mapp/Dunaway hearing (CPL 710.60 [3] [b]). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Ross and Rubin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
179 A.D.2d 440, 578 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paredes-nyappdiv-1992.