People v. Pared

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pared

205 A.D.2d 462, 615 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6737

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 462 (People v. Pared) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pared, 205 A.D.2d 462, 615 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J., at Mapp/Huntley hearing; Joan Sudolnik, J., at plea and sentence), rendered June 26, 1992, convicting defendant, after a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, [463]*463and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

An experienced undercover police officer was the purchaser in a buy-and-bust drug operation, who radioed a detailed description of defendant to the arresting officers, provided probable cause and satisfied the requirements of the AguilarSpinelli test (see, People v Parris, 83 NY2d 342; People v Petralia, 62 NY2d 47, cert denied 469 US 852). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J., at Mapp/Huntley hearing; Joan Sudolnik, J., at plea and sentence), rendered June 26, 1992, convicting defendant, after a plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, [463]*463and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

An experienced undercover police officer was the purchaser in a buy-and-bust drug operation, who radioed a detailed description of defendant to the arresting officers, provided probable cause and satisfied the requirements of the AguilarSpinelli test (see, People v Parris, 83 NY2d 342; People v Petralia, 62 NY2d 47, cert denied 469 US 852). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 462, 615 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pared-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack