People v. Pardoe

147 A.D.2d 820, 537 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1561
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 16, 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 147 A.D.2d 820 (People v. Pardoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pardoe, 147 A.D.2d 820, 537 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1561 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Kane, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Mathews, J.), rendered February 3, 1988, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree.

Defendant allegedly continued to receive welfare payments when in fact he was gainfully employed. After being indicted, he pleaded guilty to the crime of grand larceny in the fourth degree and was sentenced as a second felony offender to an indeterminate prison term of lVi to 3 years.

[821]*821On appeal, defendant claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. However, his allegations concern matters outside the record and therefore may not be considered by this court on the appeal from the judgment of conviction (see, People v Garner, 99 AD2d 596; People v Roberts, 89 AD2d 912). Additionally, on the basis of the record before us, defendant was adequately represented by counsel.

Next, defendant claims that he pleaded guilty because counsel informed him that the felony charges would be reduced to a misdemeanor charge and he would not have to serve time in a State prison. Again, however, his assertions concern factual matters not a part of the record and, therefore, are not properly before us (see, supra). In any event, at the time of his plea, County Court advised defendant that he was pleading guilty to a felony charge and that if he was determined to be a second felony offender, he would be sentenced to a prison term of 1 Vi to 3 years.

Finally, we have reviewed defendant’s claim that his sentence was harsh and excessive and find it lacking in merit. We also note that the sentence was the minimum sentence authorized.

Judgment affirmed. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Weiss, Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lunan
206 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Clark
192 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
People v. Galpin
179 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Jacobs
178 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Restrepo
175 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
People v. Burhyte
167 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Ellis
167 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 A.D.2d 820, 537 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1561, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pardoe-nyappdiv-1989.