People v. Pardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pardo

107 A.D.2d 1090, 486 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42918

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 29, 1985·Published

Opinion

— Motion to change venue granted and indictment removed for trial from Oneida County Court to Supreme Court, Monroe County. Memorandum: Under the particular circumstances presented, including the fact that three jury panels have been exhausted without completing jury selection and the extensive and continuing pretrial publicity surrounding the matter, we conclude that there is reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial jury cannot now be drawn in Oneida County. The venue of this indictment should be changed to Monroe County (see People v Acomb, 94 AD2d 978; People v Sawyer, 94 AD2d 978). Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Jan. 8, 1985.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion to change venue granted and indictment removed for trial from Oneida County Court to Supreme Court, Monroe County. Memorandum: Under the particular circumstances presented, including the fact that three jury panels have been exhausted without completing jury selection and the extensive and continuing pretrial publicity surrounding the matter, we conclude that there is reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial jury cannot now be drawn in Oneida County. The venue of this indictment should be changed to Monroe County (see People v Acomb, 94 AD2d 978; People v Sawyer, 94 AD2d 978). Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Jan. 8, 1985.)

People v. Pardo, 107 A.D.2d 1090, 486 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

107 A.D.2d 1090 (People v. Pardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related