People v. Pardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pardo

107 A.D.2d 1090, 486 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42918

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 29, 1985

StatusPublished

This text of 107 A.D.2d 1090 (People v. Pardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pardo, 107 A.D.2d 1090, 486 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

— Motion to change venue granted and indictment removed for trial from Oneida County Court to Supreme Court, Monroe County. Memorandum: Under the particular circumstances presented, including the fact that three jury panels have been exhausted without completing jury selection and the extensive and continuing pretrial publicity surrounding the matter, we conclude that there is reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial jury cannot now be drawn in Oneida County. The venue of this indictment should be changed to Monroe County (see People v Acomb, 94 AD2d 978; People v Sawyer, 94 AD2d 978). Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Jan. 8, 1985.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Motion to change venue granted and indictment removed for trial from Oneida County Court to Supreme Court, Monroe County. Memorandum: Under the particular circumstances presented, including the fact that three jury panels have been exhausted without completing jury selection and the extensive and continuing pretrial publicity surrounding the matter, we conclude that there is reasonable cause to believe that a fair and impartial jury cannot now be drawn in Oneida County. The venue of this indictment should be changed to Monroe County (see People v Acomb, 94 AD2d 978; People v Sawyer, 94 AD2d 978). Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Green and Schnepp, JJ. (Order entered Jan. 8, 1985.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 A.D.2d 1090, 486 N.Y.S.2d 534, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 42918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pardo-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack