People v. Pappacena

57 A.D.3d 1011, 869 N.Y.2d 795
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 57 A.D.3d 1011 (People v. Pappacena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Pappacena, 57 A.D.3d 1011, 869 N.Y.2d 795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

The defendant’s contention that the plea of guilty was not voluntary because it was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review since he did not move to withdraw his plea on that basis (see People v Clarke, 93 NY2d 904, 906 [1999]; People v Perez, 51 AD3d 1043 [2008]; People v Scoca, 38 AD3d 801 [2007]; People v Lopez, 34 AD3d 599 [2006]).

The defendant entered a plea of guilty after the Supreme Court Ordered a hearing on that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress evidence, but before the hearing was held. By pleading guilty before the County Court decided his motion to suppress evidence, the defendant forfeited appellate review of the issues raised in that motion (see CPL 710.70 [2]; People v Fernandez, 67 NY2d 686, 688 [1986]; People v Hussain, 309 AD2d 818, 818-819 [2003]; People v Carter, 304 AD2d 771, [1012]*1012772 [2003]; People v Holmes, 268 AD2d 597, 598 [2000]). Rivera, J.E, Florio, Angiolillo, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Owens
141 A.D.3d 675 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Richardson
106 A.D.3d 1028 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A.D.3d 1011, 869 N.Y.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pappacena-nyappdiv-2008.