People v. Pantojas
This text of 53 A.D.3d 669 (People v. Pantojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Bartlett, J.), rendered December 4, 2006, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
“[S]ince the defendant received the minimum sentence [670]*670permitted by law, this Court has no authority to reduce it as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice” (People v Howard, 50 AD3d 823 [2008]; see CPL 470.20 [6]; People v Wilson, 28 AD3d 796, 797 [2006]; People v Muller, 294 AD2d 602 [2002]). Spolzino, J.P, Fisher, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 A.D.3d 669, 861 N.Y.S.2d 594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pantojas-nyappdiv-2008.