Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Pantaleon

People v. Pantaleon

98 A.D.3d 1066, 950 N.Y.S.2d 597
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 19, 2012·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), imposed May 26, 2011, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Azeez, 95 AD3d 1349 [2012]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103 [2011]). Mastro, A.PJ., Rivera, Belen, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pantaleon, 98 A.D.3d 1066, 950 N.Y.S.2d 597 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

98 A.D.3d 1066 (People v. Pantaleon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hidalgo
698 N.E.2d 46 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Foy
89 A.D.3d 1103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Azeez
95 A.D.3d 1349 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)