People v. Pannone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pannone

188 A.D.2d 621, 592 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14459

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 621 (People v. Pannone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pannone, 188 A.D.2d 621, 592 N.Y.S.2d 616, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14459 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), rendered November 13, 1990, convicting him of scheme to defraud in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon our review of the minutes of the plea proceedings, we find that the defendant’s plea was knowing and voluntary and that the allocution was factually sufficient (see, People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9).

In addition, we find no merit to the defendant’s contention that he should have been permitted to withdraw his guilty plea. The decision to permit the withdrawal of a guilty plea rests within the sound discretion of the court (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Dickerson, 163 AD2d 610).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI