People v. Pannone
This text of 8 A.D.2d 608 (People v. Pannone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment modified in the exercise of discretion, to make the third consecutive sentence run concurrently instead of consecutively with the second consecutive sentence imposed; and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The sentence imposed, on the record and on the probation report, was excessive. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin and Stevens, JJ.; McNally, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 608, 184 N.Y.S.2d 677, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pannone-nyappdiv-1959.