People v. Paneto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Paneto

53 A.D.2d 651, 384 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 651 (People v. Paneto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Paneto, 53 A.D.2d 651, 384 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 11, 1974, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The findings of fact are affirmed. Conviction on the charge of attempted robbery in the first degree requires a dismissal of the inclusory concurrent count of attempted grand larceny in the third degree (see People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847). A review of the other contentions raised on appeal shows them to lack merit. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 11, 1974, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and the sentence imposed thereon, and the said count is dismissed. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The findings of fact are affirmed. Conviction on the charge of attempted robbery in the first degree requires a dismissal of the inclusory concurrent count of attempted grand larceny in the third degree (see People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847). A review of the other contentions raised on appeal shows them to lack merit. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 651, 384 N.Y.S.2d 491, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paneto-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack