People v. Pandeline
This text of 141 Misc. 241 (People v. Pandeline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment for rape in this case must be granted, the evidence being insufficient to warrant the submission of the case to a trial jury.
Sadie Prussian, a seventeen-year old girl, charges that she was raped by the defendant while in a taxicab. The defendant, when arrested, denied the charge. Under the law, there must be corroboration of the charge on the testimony of the prosecutrix which is entirely lacking. The district attorney who appeared for the People on this argument conceded that the testimony was insufficient.
Motion to dismiss indictment granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 Misc. 241, 251 N.Y.S. 384, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pandeline-nygensess-1931.