People v. Pamperien
This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 06964 (People v. Pamperien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
| People v Pamperien |
| 2025 NY Slip Op 06964 |
| Decided on December 16, 2025 |
| Court of Appeals |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on December 16, 2025
No. 130 SSM 6
v
Gary Pamperien, Appellant.
Submitted by Genevieve M. Cahill, for appellant.
Submitted by Kim Marie Carson, for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Defendant's challenge to his designation as a sexually violent offender is moot because, after we granted leave, County Court removed that designation.
Defendant's challenges to his risk level classification, to the extent preserved, are meritless. The record supports the points assessed, and defendant's argument that he should have been granted a downward departure does not warrant reversal.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Wilson and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Singas, Cannataro, Troutman and Halligan concur.
Decided December 16, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 NY Slip Op 06964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pamperien-ny-2025.