People v. Palomo
This text of 1 Guam 286 (People v. Palomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Guam primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DECISION
A motion having been heard pursuant to Section 170 of the Code of Civil Procedure to disqualify me as a trial judge in the matter of the People of the Territory of Guam against Patrick J. Palomo; and the basis for the disqualification being the comments that I made in a prior case where the jury came back with a verdict of not guilty. As a trial judge in that case, I disagreed with the verdict having felt that the evidence was sufficient to sustain a conviction.
The motion to disqualify me as trial judge is hereby denied; and pursuant to Section 172 of the Code of Civil Procedure, I make the following statements:
That the comments that were made during the trial of the People of the Territory of Guam v. Patrick J. Palomo, Criminal Case No. 111F-75, charged with Burglary in the Second Degree, is not prejudicial to the defendant in this case;
That this is a new jury panel; and that the instructions I will give to the jury will be that they are the sole judges of the facts; and comments or statements made by me should be totally disregarded by them. This would cure any possible prejudice that has been raised by defense counsel pursuant to Section 170.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Guam 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-palomo-superctguam-1975.