People v. Palo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Palo

299 A.D.2d 871, 749 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10944

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 299 A.D.2d 871 (People v. Palo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Palo, 299 A.D.2d 871, 749 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10944 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Mark, J.), entered March 22, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: The contention of defendant that the prosecutor improperly instructed the grand jury does not survive his plea of guilty (see People v Miles, 237 AD2d 991, lv denied 90 NY2d 861; People v Ivey [appeal No. 2], 229 AD2d 1020, lv denied 89 NY2d 865; People v Garcia, 216 AD2d 36, 36-37). In any event, we conclude upon our review of the grand jury minutes that the prosecutor did not err in instructing the grand jury. Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County (Mark, J.), entered March 22, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: The contention of defendant that the prosecutor improperly instructed the grand jury does not survive his plea of guilty (see People v Miles, 237 AD2d 991, lv denied 90 NY2d 861; People v Ivey [appeal No. 2], 229 AD2d 1020, lv denied 89 NY2d 865; People v Garcia, 216 AD2d 36, 36-37). In any event, we conclude upon our review of the grand jury minutes that the prosecutor did not err in instructing the grand jury. Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.D.2d 871, 749 N.Y.S.2d 452, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-palo-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack