People v. Palmer

212 A.D.2d 742, 623 N.Y.S.2d 157
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Palmer. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 A.D.2d 883

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Tisch, J.), rendered June 10, 1993, convicting him of rape in the first degree (two counts), sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts), and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reversing the defendant’s conviction of rape in the first degree under count number three, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally insufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of rape in [743]*743the first degree under the third count of the indictment. Specifically, there was legally insufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant had sexual intercourse with the complaining witness in September or October 1991 (see, Penal Law §§ 130.00, 130.35).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Lawrence, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Palmer, 212 A.D.2d 742, 623 N.Y.S.2d 157 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 742 (People v. Palmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)