People v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Palmer

99 A.D.2d 981, 472 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17396

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 13, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 99 A.D.2d 981 (People v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Palmer, 99 A.D.2d 981, 472 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (M. Williams, J.), rendered June 28,1982, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 2 years, 4 months to 7 years to run consecutively to aggregate definite sentences of 9 months, modified, on the law, by directing the instant sentence to run concurrently with the definite sentences, and, as modified, affirmed. 11 As the People concede, the indeterminate sentence in this proceeding should run concurrently with the definite sentences previously imposed upon the defendant (Penal Law, § 70.35). We find no merit to defendant’s claim that the indeterminate sentence was excessive. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Silverman and Alexander, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (M. Williams, J.), rendered June 28,1982, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of 2 years, 4 months to 7 years to run consecutively to aggregate definite sentences of 9 months, modified, on the law, by directing the instant sentence to run concurrently with the definite sentences, and, as modified, affirmed. 11 As the People concede, the indeterminate sentence in this proceeding should run concurrently with the definite sentences previously imposed upon the defendant (Penal Law, § 70.35). We find no merit to defendant’s claim that the indeterminate sentence was excessive. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Silverman and Alexander, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 981, 472 N.Y.S.2d 865, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-palmer-nyappdiv-1984.