People v. Pallateri

120 A.D.3d 514, 989 N.Y.S.2d 905
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 6, 2014·No. 2013-06705·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Zayas, J.), imposed May 24, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, PJ., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pallateri, 120 A.D.3d 514, 989 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

120 A.D.3d 514 (People v. Pallateri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Diasia F.
2018 NY Slip Op 5938 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)