People v. Paige

117 A.D.3d 475, 984 N.Y.S.2d 594
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Paige. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 A.D.3d 912

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), entered on or about September 5, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level three predicate sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly applied the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction, and properly exercised its discretion in denying a downward departure (see People v Cintron, 12 NY3d 60, 70 [2009], cert denied 558 US 1011 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Among other things, the underlying conviction involved a pattern of serious criminal conduct committed against a child, and defendant has been convicted, in another state, of failing to comply with sex offender registration requirements.

Concur — Tom, J.E, Acosta, Andrias, DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Paige, 117 A.D.3d 475, 984 N.Y.S.2d 594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

117 A.D.3d 475 (People v. Paige) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Knox
903 N.E.2d 1149 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
In re Kalil
130 S. Ct. 554 (Supreme Court, 2009)