People v. Paige

294 A.D.2d 844, 741 N.Y.S.2d 465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Paige. Read the opinion of the Court — 289 A.D.2d 872
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 3, 2002·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Brunetti, J.), entered September 12, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, burglary in the first degree..

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [3]) and three counts of robbery in the first degree (§ 160.15 [3]). As we determined on codefendant’s appeal (People v Paige, 289 AD2d 1072), the showup identification procedure was not unduly suggestive. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Hayes, Kehoe and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Paige, 294 A.D.2d 844, 741 N.Y.S.2d 465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

294 A.D.2d 844 (People v. Paige) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Paige
289 A.D.2d 1072 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)