People v. Page

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Page

77 A.D.3d 973, 909 N.Y.S.2d 404

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 26, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.3d 973 (People v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Page, 77 A.D.3d 973, 909 N.Y.S.2d 404 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered January 17, 2008, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[974]*974The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. He has no basis to now complain that the sentence was excessive (see People v Fanelli, 8 AD3d 296 [2004]; People v Mejia, 6 AD3d 630, 631 [2004]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Covello, Eng, Leventhal and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered January 17, 2008, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

[974]*974The defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed. He has no basis to now complain that the sentence was excessive (see People v Fanelli, 8 AD3d 296 [2004]; People v Mejia, 6 AD3d 630, 631 [2004]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). In any event, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Rivera, J.P., Covello, Eng, Leventhal and Austin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.3d 973, 909 N.Y.S.2d 404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-page-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack