People v. Page
This text of 393 N.E.2d 1031 (People v. Page) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The supplemental instructions which the court delivered *970 were essentially neutral and therefore did not seek to coerce a particular juror into accepting a particular view of the facts (see People v Pagan, 45 NY2d 725, 727; People v Carter, 40 NY2d 933, 934). We have examined appellant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 N.E.2d 1031, 47 N.Y.2d 968, 419 N.Y.S.2d 958, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 2214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-page-ny-1979.