People v. Pagan

142 A.D.3d 1186, 37 N.Y.S.3d 898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Pagan. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 A.D.3d 779
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 2016·No. 2014-01431·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the de-

fendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), imposed January 16, 2014, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 267 [2011]; People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]; People v McBride, 106 AD3d 1110, 1110 [2013]). However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Maltese and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Pagan, 142 A.D.3d 1186, 37 N.Y.S.3d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 1186 (People v. Pagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Callahan
80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. McBride
106 A.D.3d 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)