People v. Pagan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pagan

290 A.D.2d 216, 735 N.Y.S.2d 754, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 191

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 3, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 290 A.D.2d 216 (People v. Pagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pagan, 290 A.D.2d 216, 735 N.Y.S.2d 754, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 191 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.), rendered April 16, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, [217]*217of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to three concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment on each of his three separate cases, particularly in light of the circumstances that while awaiting sentencing on the first two cases and after having been expressly warned that a new arrest would forfeit his original plea bargain, defendant was once again arrested and convicted of selling drugs. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert Seewald, J.), rendered April 16, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, [217]*217of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to three concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender treatment on each of his three separate cases, particularly in light of the circumstances that while awaiting sentencing on the first two cases and after having been expressly warned that a new arrest would forfeit his original plea bargain, defendant was once again arrested and convicted of selling drugs. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Williams, Andrias, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 A.D.2d 216, 735 N.Y.S.2d 754, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pagan-nyappdiv-2002.