People v. Pagan
This text of 109 A.D.2d 852 (People v. Pagan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), [853]*853both rendered October 17, 1983, each convicting him of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.
Judgments affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve the issue of the sufficiency of the plea allocutions for appellate review (People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Santiago, 100 AD2d 857). In any event, the plea allocution was sufficient (People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9). The sentences imposed, pursuant to agreement and justified by defendant’s noncooperation, were neither unduly harsh nor excessive. Gibbons, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Brown, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 A.D.2d 852, 487 N.Y.S.2d 541, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 47365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pagan-nyappdiv-1985.