People v. Padworski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Padworski

91 A.D.3d 523, 936 N.Y.2d 541

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Padworski. Read the opinion of the Court — 63 A.D.3d 558 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 2012·Published

Opinion

This Court had previously remitted this matter to the Supreme Court for a violation of probation hearing (63 AD3d 558 [2009]). The court conducted a hearing and correctly determined that defendant had violated probation. However, in light of all the circumstances of the case we find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

The arguments in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief do not warrant any remedy other than the indicated reduction of sentence. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This Court had previously remitted this matter to the Supreme Court for a violation of probation hearing (63 AD3d 558 [2009]). The court conducted a hearing and correctly determined that defendant had violated probation. However, in light of all the circumstances of the case we find the sentence excessive to the extent indicated.

The arguments in defendant’s pro se supplemental brief do not warrant any remedy other than the indicated reduction of sentence. Concur — Andrias, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.

People v. Padworski, 91 A.D.3d 523, 936 N.Y.2d 541 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

91 A.D.3d 523 (People v. Padworski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.