People v. Paduani

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Paduani

284 A.D.2d 194, 726 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6162

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 284 A.D.2d 194 (People v. Paduani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Paduani, 284 A.D.2d 194, 726 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered December 22, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years concurrent with a term of time served, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s questioning of an individual deliberating juror did not coerce him into surrendering any conscientiously held views. The court had previously delivered proper supplementary instructions to the deliberating jury as a whole, and the juror in question clearly stated that based on these instructions he could reach a fair verdict based on the evidence and the law. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Daniel FitzGerald, J.), rendered December 22, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and unlawful possession of marijuana, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to two concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years concurrent with a term of time served, unanimously affirmed.

The court’s questioning of an individual deliberating juror did not coerce him into surrendering any conscientiously held views. The court had previously delivered proper supplementary instructions to the deliberating jury as a whole, and the juror in question clearly stated that based on these instructions he could reach a fair verdict based on the evidence and the law. Concur — Williams, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Lerner and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 A.D.2d 194, 726 N.Y.S.2d 264, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-paduani-nyappdiv-2001.