People v. Padilla

187 N.Y.S.3d 231, 2023 NY Slip Op 02593
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 11, 2023
DocketInd No. 1751/18 Appeal No. 226 Case No. 2020-04073
StatusPublished

This text of 187 N.Y.S.3d 231 (People v. Padilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Padilla, 187 N.Y.S.3d 231, 2023 NY Slip Op 02593 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Padilla (2023 NY Slip Op 02593)
People v Padilla
2023 NY Slip Op 02593
Decided on May 11, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 11, 2023
Before: Oing, J.P., Singh, González, Kennedy, Scarpulla, JJ.

Ind No. 1751/18 Appeal No. 226 Case No. 2020-04073

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Mark Padilla, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Shaina R. Watrous of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Cynthia A. Carlson of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ralph Fabrizio, J.), entered on or about April 20, 2020, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-c), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841 [2014]). The mitigating factors cited by defendant, including his unexceptional response to a treatment program that he did not complete, were adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument, or were not shown to reduce defendant's individual risk of reoffense (see People v Ortega, 209 AD3d 540, 540 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 908 [2023]). In any event, these mitigating factors were outweighed by aggravating factors, including defendant's criminal history and the seriousness of the underlying crime, in which he sexually exploited a child over a period of years.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 11, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gillotti
18 N.E.3d 701 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
People v. Ortega
175 N.Y.S.3d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 N.Y.S.3d 231, 2023 NY Slip Op 02593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-padilla-nyappdiv-2023.