People v. Padilla

76 A.D.2d 907, 907 N.Y.S.2d 862
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Padilla. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 A.D.3d 505

Opinion

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered April 17, 2009, resentencing defendant to concurrent terms of 12 years, with five years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was not barred by double jeopardy, since defendant was still serving his prison term at that time, and therefore had no reasonable expectation of finality in his illegal sentence (see People v Murrell, 73 AD3d 598 [2010]).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s due process argument. Defendant’s remaining claims are similar to arguments that were rejected in People v Williams (14 NY3d 198 [2010]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Padilla, 76 A.D.2d 907, 907 N.Y.S.2d 862 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

76 A.D.2d 907 (People v. Padilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Williams
925 N.E.2d 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 2010)
People v. Murrell
73 A.D.3d 598 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)