People v. Padilla

208 A.D.2d 567, 616 N.Y.S.2d 1012
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Padilla. Read the opinion of the Court — 219 A.D.2d 688

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered July 21, 1993, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of probation upon his previous conviction of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues [568]*568which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 4tl NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Padilla, 208 A.D.2d 567, 616 N.Y.S.2d 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 567 (People v. Padilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)