People v. Padilla

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Padilla

136 A.D.2d 749, 524 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 875

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A.D.2d 749 (People v. Padilla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Padilla, 136 A.D.2d 749, 524 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 875 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered April 30, 1986, convicting him of robbery [750]*750in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial based on the trial court’s refusal to admit into evidence a written entry in the arresting officer’s memo book concerning the complainant’s prior inconsistent statement. At the time the defense counsel’s request was made, the content of the memo book entry concerning the complainant’s statement had already been brought to the jury’s attention when the arresting officer was confronted with his pretrial testimony in which he testified to the contents of the entry. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hellenbrand, J.), rendered April 30, 1986, convicting him of robbery [750]*750in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We disagree with the defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial based on the trial court’s refusal to admit into evidence a written entry in the arresting officer’s memo book concerning the complainant’s prior inconsistent statement. At the time the defense counsel’s request was made, the content of the memo book entry concerning the complainant’s statement had already been brought to the jury’s attention when the arresting officer was confronted with his pretrial testimony in which he testified to the contents of the entry. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A.D.2d 749, 524 N.Y.S.2d 86, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-padilla-nyappdiv-1988.