People v. Padian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Padian

137 A.D.2d 632, 524 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 982

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 8, 1988·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant as limited by her brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), imposed November 13, 1985, upon her conviction of vehicular manslaughter, driving while under the influence of alcohol (two counts), and violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1126 (a) upon her plea of guilty.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Considering the nature and circumstances of the crime, we find no merit in the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Anderson, 131 AD2d 490; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant as limited by her brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), imposed November 13, 1985, upon her conviction of vehicular manslaughter, driving while under the influence of alcohol (two counts), and violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1126 (a) upon her plea of guilty.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Considering the nature and circumstances of the crime, we find no merit in the defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see, People v Anderson, 131 AD2d 490; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, J. P., Kunzeman, Rubin, Kooper and Harwood, JJ., concur.

People v. Padian, 137 A.D.2d 632, 524 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

137 A.D.2d 632 (People v. Padian) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related