People v. Pabon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Pabon

256 A.D.2d 361, 682 N.Y.S.2d 360, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13153

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 361 (People v. Pabon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Pabon, 256 A.D.2d 361, 682 N.Y.S.2d 360, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13153 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered September 17, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal posession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to establish his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), rendered September 17, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal posession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to establish his guilt of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 361, 682 N.Y.S.2d 360, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-pabon-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack