People v. Ozorio

139 A.D.3d 758, 29 N.Y.S.3d 190
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 4, 2016
Docket2012-10771
StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 758 (People v. Ozorio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ozorio, 139 A.D.3d 758, 29 N.Y.S.3d 190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), imposed October 19, 2012, as amended November 15, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Austin, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.3d 758, 29 N.Y.S.3d 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ozorio-nyappdiv-2016.