People v. Ozorio

139 A.D.3d 758, 29 N.Y.S.3d 190
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 4, 2016·No. 2012-10771·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), imposed October 19, 2012, as amended November 15, 2012, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257 [2011]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Austin, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ozorio, 139 A.D.3d 758, 29 N.Y.S.3d 190 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

139 A.D.3d 758 (People v. Ozorio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)