People v. Ozorio

129 A.D.3d 868, 9 N.Y.S.3d 887
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 10, 2015
Docket2012-09342
StatusPublished

This text of 129 A.D.3d 868 (People v. Ozorio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Ozorio, 129 A.D.3d 868, 9 N.Y.S.3d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), both imposed September 13, 2012, upon his convictions of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under indictment No. 1140/ 11, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 1440/12, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

*869 Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 A.D.3d 868, 9 N.Y.S.3d 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-ozorio-nyappdiv-2015.