People v. Ozorio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Ozorio

129 A.D.3d 868, 9 N.Y.S.3d 887

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 2015·No. 2012-09342·Published

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), both imposed September 13, 2012, upon his convictions of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under indictment No. 1140/ 11, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 1440/12, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

*869 Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), both imposed September 13, 2012, upon his convictions of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree under indictment No. 1140/ 11, and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 1440/12, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

*869 Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Roman and LaSalle, JJ., concur.

People v. Ozorio, 129 A.D.3d 868, 9 N.Y.S.3d 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

129 A.D.3d 868 (People v. Ozorio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related