People v. Owens

222 A.D.2d 1115, 636 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14264
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Owens. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 A.D.2d 480

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to suppress defendant’s statements to the police. The record supports the court’s determination that the statements were voluntarily made (see, CPL 60.45) and that they were not obtained in violation of defendant’s right to counsel (see, People v Bing, 76 NY2d 331; People v Windbush, 202 AD2d 527, lv denied 83 NY2d 878).

The sentence imposed is not unduly harsh or severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Owens, 222 A.D.2d 1115, 636 N.Y.S.2d 706, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 1115 (People v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bing
558 N.E.2d 1011 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
Adventist Home, Inc. v. Board of Assessors of Livingston
634 N.E.2d 972 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Windbush
202 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)