People v. Owens

152 A.D.2d 959, 543 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9852
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Owens. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 A.D.2d 696

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The suppression court properly found that the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant. The police knew a burglary had been committed minutes earlier and followed an unbroken trail of fresh footprints in the snow leading to defendant. Defendant slowed from a run to a walk and was out of breath when first observed by the police, he was wearing large sneakers which fit the footprints, he gave a false identification and he was recognized by the police officer [960]*960from his prior involvement in burglary related incidents. Under these circumstances a reasonable person would conclude that defendant was the perpetrator of the attempted burglary (see, People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 602; People v Cantor, 36 NY2d 106, 111; People v Johnson, 102 AD2d 616, 623; People v Grant, 83 AD2d 277, 280; People v Karpel, 66 AD2d 960, 961). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — attempted burglary, second degree; criminal mischief, fourth degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Denman, Green and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Owens, 152 A.D.2d 959, 543 N.Y.S.2d 782, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 959 (People v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Cantor
324 N.E.2d 872 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. McRay
416 N.E.2d 1015 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Karpel
66 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Grant
83 A.D.2d 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Johnson
102 A.D.2d 616 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)