People v. Overton

90 A.D.2d 855, 457 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19128

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lentol, J.), rendered February 13, 1981, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. Criminal Term committed a number of errors in charging the jury which resulted in the jury being confused and prevented it from adequately applying the correct principles of law to the facts before it. Consequently, we are compelled to conclude that under the circumstances, the convictions must be overturned and a new trial ordered (see People v O’Brien, 88 AD2d 1001; People v Wimms, 80 AD2d 837). O’Connor, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Overton, 90 A.D.2d 855, 457 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

90 A.D.2d 855 (People v. Overton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wimms
80 A.D.2d 837 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. O'Brien
88 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)