People v. Otty

223 A.D.2d 364, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 9, 1996·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.), entered March 24, 1994, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress a gun, unanimously affirmed.

The frisk of defendant was not supported by a reasonable [365]*365belief, based on specific and articulable facts, that defendant had committed or was about to commit a crime nor that he was armed and presently dangerous. Defendant’s "mere propinquity to others independently suspected of criminal activity d[id] not, without more, give rise to probable cause to search [him]” (Ybarra v Illinois, 444 US 85, 91; Matter of Nelson S., 196 AD2d 422, 424-425). Thus, there was no legal basis for the frisk and the hearing court properly suppressed the gun recovered from defendant. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Otty, 223 A.D.2d 364, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

223 A.D.2d 364 (People v. Otty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Dean
73 A.D.3d 801 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Williams
305 A.D.2d 804 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
People v. Bellamy
228 A.D.2d 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)