People v. Otto
This text of 184 A.D.2d 664 (People v. Otto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered March 13, 1991.
[665]*665Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.
The transcript of the plea proceedings establishes that the defendant’s waiver of his right to appellate review was knowing, voluntary, intelligent, and part of his favorably negotiated guilty plea (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Anda, 157 AD2d 786; People v Roberts, 152 AD2d 678). In light of the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal, we do not review his claim that his sentence is unduly harsh (see, People v Hall, 176 AD2d 960). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 A.D.2d 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-otto-nyappdiv-1992.