People v. Otto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Otto

184 A.D.2d 664

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1992·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered March 13, 1991.

[665] Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

The transcript of the plea proceedings establishes that the defendant’s waiver of his right to appellate review was knowing, voluntary, intelligent, and part of his favorably negotiated guilty plea (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Anda, 157 AD2d 786; People v Roberts, 152 AD2d 678). In light of the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal, we do not review his claim that his sentence is unduly harsh (see, People v Hall, 176 AD2d 960). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Putnam County (Braatz, J.), rendered March 13, 1991.

[665] Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

The transcript of the plea proceedings establishes that the defendant’s waiver of his right to appellate review was knowing, voluntary, intelligent, and part of his favorably negotiated guilty plea (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; People v Anda, 157 AD2d 786; People v Roberts, 152 AD2d 678). In light of the defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal, we do not review his claim that his sentence is unduly harsh (see, People v Hall, 176 AD2d 960). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

People v. Otto, 184 A.D.2d 664 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

184 A.D.2d 664 (People v. Otto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related