People v. O'Toole

New York Court of Appeals

People v. O'Toole

159 N.E.2d 703, 6 N.Y.2d 834

DecidedMay 28, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 159 N.E.2d 703 (People v. O'Toole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. O'Toole, 159 N.E.2d 703, 6 N.Y.2d 834 (N.Y. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders reversed and information reinstated. Treating the disposition of these cases by the Court of Special Sessions as a dismissal of the informations upon the opening statement of the prosecutor, as supplemented by the statements of defense counsel, the trial court had no right to dismiss the informations and should have proceeded to trial. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Ftjld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders reversed and information reinstated. Treating the disposition of these cases by the Court of Special Sessions as a dismissal of the informations upon the opening statement of the prosecutor, as supplemented by the statements of defense counsel, the trial court had no right to dismiss the informations and should have proceeded to trial. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Ftjld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 N.E.2d 703, 6 N.Y.2d 834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-otoole-ny-1959.